Problem-Aware vs Solution-Aware Buyers: How Founder-Led Product Sales Actually Work
Problem-Aware vs Solution-Aware Buyers: How Founder-Led Product Sales Actually Work
When founders take a product to market, the instinct is to focus on the product itself; what it does, why it exists, how it’s different.
What quickly becomes clear is that the product isn’t the variable.
The people on the other side of the conversation are.
Some come in already convinced something needs to change and are simply deciding what to use.
Others feel the friction every day but haven’t yet connected it to a clear solution. And some don’t see a problem at all, because the workarounds have become part of the job.
Those differences quietly shape every product conversation. They determine what questions get asked, what lands, and what never quite does.
They also change what a founder’s role needs to be in the moment, whether that’s narrowing options, clarifying the problem, or helping someone notice what’s been hiding in plain sight.
Understanding these patterns doesn’t change the product.
It changes how founders show up when they sell it.
The Core Framework: Three Buyer Awareness States
Across product marketing and modern go-to-market work, this same pattern keeps surfacing.
Founders run into three distinct buyer states again and again.
Once you recognize them, sales conversations stop feeling random.
They start to feel explainable and relatable.
Solution-Aware Buyers
Solution-aware buyers already know they have a problem.
They also believe a category of tools or services exists to solve it. When they talk to a founder, they aren’t debating whether change is needed. They’re deciding which option makes the most sense.
These conversations revolve around trust and fit.
Buyers want to understand whether the product aligns with how they actually operate, whether the team behind it understands the constraints they’re working within, and whether adopting it introduces risk they don’t want to absorb.
There isn’t much teaching to do here.
Too much explanation often gets in the way. Clear positioning, honest boundaries, and a solid understanding of where the product fits tend to move things forward faster.
When teams were already shopping for customer data platforms, companies like Segment weren’t convincing anyone that data fragmentation was a problem.
Teams were living it. The conversation centered on architecture, flexibility, and whether the platform fit cleanly into an existing stack without creating more downstream complexity.
For founders, these conversations often feel straightforward. The hardest question has already been answered.
The buyer believes a solution belongs here.
What remains is choosing the right one.
Problem-Aware Buyers
Problem-aware buyers feel the pain clearly, but they don’t yet know what the solution should look like.
They can describe what’s frustrating them, where things slow down, and what feels heavier than it should.
What’s missing is a clear picture of why it keeps happening.
This is where founders are most tempted to move too quickly. When a solution shows up before the problem has taken shape, it can feel abstract, even when the product is a strong match.
The work in these conversations is about clarity.
Founders help surface what’s actually happening, how small issues compound over time, and which tradeoffs the buyer has quietly accepted just to keep things moving.
Once the problem has a clear outline, the solution no longer feels theoretical.
This showed up early with Slack. Teams knew email felt inefficient, but few could explain why it slowed work down.
Slack spent time helping teams see how fragmented conversations and constant context-switching affected focus and decision-making.
Once that clicked, the product spoke for itself.
When founders skip this step, conversations tend to stall. When they slow down and focus on shaping the problem first, momentum usually follows.
Unaware Buyers
Unaware buyers don’t believe they have a problem at all.
That doesn’t make them careless or resistant. In many cases, they’re successful teams who have adapted well enough for friction to fade into the background.
Workarounds accumulate. Extra headcount fills gaps. Manual checks become routine.
The cost is real, but it blends into daily operations because it built up gradually.
These conversations rarely move forward through persuasion.
What works here is observation. Founders point out patterns. Where effort keeps increasing. Where confidence starts to slip. Where systems lag behind the pace of the business.
You can see this approach in how Basecamp talked about work long before many teams believed project management itself was broken.
The conversation wasn’t about tools. It was about how complexity crept in over time and how process quietly became heavier than it needed to be.
Similar thinking shows up in public discussions from leaders at Atlassian and Shopify around internal systems.
Tools that start out “good enough” tend to collect exceptions. The impact doesn’t arrive all at once. It spreads slowly, until it feels like the cost of doing business.
For founders, it helps to recognize that many unaware-buyer conversations won’t move forward right away.
Why This Framework Matters in Founder-Led Product Sales
Founders often see uneven results not because the product is unclear, but because the same approach is used in very different situations.
This framework explains why some conversations move quickly while others slow down, and why the same explanation can resonate one day and miss the mark the next.
More importantly, it keeps founders from forcing the wrong conversation. Solution-aware buyers are deciding on fit. Problem-aware buyers are working toward clarity. Unaware buyers are still learning what to pay attention to.
When founders adjust to where someone actually is, sales conversations feel calmer and more productive.
Energy goes toward progress instead of friction.
This framework sits above individual products, features, and campaigns.
It gives founders, sales teams, and marketers shared language without tying them to a specific tactic.
As a pillar, it supports future content around product launches, custom software, AI tools, dashboards, and security by providing common ground.
Those conversations can build on this foundation without re-explaining the basics.
For founders doing the selling themselves, this becomes a steady lens they can carry into every product conversation that follows.
Problem-Aware vs Solution-Aware Buyers: How Founder-Led Product Sales Actually Work
Problem-Aware vs Solution-Aware Buyers: How Founder-Led Product Sales Actually Work
When founders take a product to market, the instinct is to focus on the product itself; what it does, why it exists, how it’s different.
What quickly becomes clear is that the product isn’t the variable.
The people on the other side of the conversation are.
Some come in already convinced something needs to change and are simply deciding what to use.
Others feel the friction every day but haven’t yet connected it to a clear solution. And some don’t see a problem at all, because the workarounds have become part of the job.
Those differences quietly shape every product conversation. They determine what questions get asked, what lands, and what never quite does.
They also change what a founder’s role needs to be in the moment, whether that’s narrowing options, clarifying the problem, or helping someone notice what’s been hiding in plain sight.
Understanding these patterns doesn’t change the product.
It changes how founders show up when they sell it.
The Core Framework: Three Buyer Awareness States
Across product marketing and modern go-to-market work, this same pattern keeps surfacing.
Founders run into three distinct buyer states again and again.
Once you recognize them, sales conversations stop feeling random.
They start to feel explainable and relatable.
Solution-Aware Buyers
Solution-aware buyers already know they have a problem.
They also believe a category of tools or services exists to solve it. When they talk to a founder, they aren’t debating whether change is needed. They’re deciding which option makes the most sense.
These conversations revolve around trust and fit.
Buyers want to understand whether the product aligns with how they actually operate, whether the team behind it understands the constraints they’re working within, and whether adopting it introduces risk they don’t want to absorb.
There isn’t much teaching to do here.
Too much explanation often gets in the way. Clear positioning, honest boundaries, and a solid understanding of where the product fits tend to move things forward faster.
When teams were already shopping for customer data platforms, companies like Segment weren’t convincing anyone that data fragmentation was a problem.
Teams were living it. The conversation centered on architecture, flexibility, and whether the platform fit cleanly into an existing stack without creating more downstream complexity.
For founders, these conversations often feel straightforward. The hardest question has already been answered.
The buyer believes a solution belongs here.
What remains is choosing the right one.
Problem-Aware Buyers
Problem-aware buyers feel the pain clearly, but they don’t yet know what the solution should look like.
They can describe what’s frustrating them, where things slow down, and what feels heavier than it should.
What’s missing is a clear picture of why it keeps happening.
This is where founders are most tempted to move too quickly. When a solution shows up before the problem has taken shape, it can feel abstract, even when the product is a strong match.
The work in these conversations is about clarity.
Founders help surface what’s actually happening, how small issues compound over time, and which tradeoffs the buyer has quietly accepted just to keep things moving.
Once the problem has a clear outline, the solution no longer feels theoretical.
This showed up early with Slack. Teams knew email felt inefficient, but few could explain why it slowed work down.
Slack spent time helping teams see how fragmented conversations and constant context-switching affected focus and decision-making.
Once that clicked, the product spoke for itself.
When founders skip this step, conversations tend to stall. When they slow down and focus on shaping the problem first, momentum usually follows.
Unaware Buyers
Unaware buyers don’t believe they have a problem at all.
That doesn’t make them careless or resistant. In many cases, they’re successful teams who have adapted well enough for friction to fade into the background.
Workarounds accumulate. Extra headcount fills gaps. Manual checks become routine.
The cost is real, but it blends into daily operations because it built up gradually.
These conversations rarely move forward through persuasion.
What works here is observation. Founders point out patterns. Where effort keeps increasing. Where confidence starts to slip. Where systems lag behind the pace of the business.
You can see this approach in how Basecamp talked about work long before many teams believed project management itself was broken.
The conversation wasn’t about tools. It was about how complexity crept in over time and how process quietly became heavier than it needed to be.
Similar thinking shows up in public discussions from leaders at Atlassian and Shopify around internal systems.
Tools that start out “good enough” tend to collect exceptions. The impact doesn’t arrive all at once. It spreads slowly, until it feels like the cost of doing business.
For founders, it helps to recognize that many unaware-buyer conversations won’t move forward right away.
Why This Framework Matters in Founder-Led Product Sales
Founders often see uneven results not because the product is unclear, but because the same approach is used in very different situations.
This framework explains why some conversations move quickly while others slow down, and why the same explanation can resonate one day and miss the mark the next.
More importantly, it keeps founders from forcing the wrong conversation. Solution-aware buyers are deciding on fit. Problem-aware buyers are working toward clarity. Unaware buyers are still learning what to pay attention to.
When founders adjust to where someone actually is, sales conversations feel calmer and more productive.
Energy goes toward progress instead of friction.
This framework sits above individual products, features, and campaigns.
It gives founders, sales teams, and marketers shared language without tying them to a specific tactic.
As a pillar, it supports future content around product launches, custom software, AI tools, dashboards, and security by providing common ground.
Those conversations can build on this foundation without re-explaining the basics.
For founders doing the selling themselves, this becomes a steady lens they can carry into every product conversation that follows.
Our superpower is custom software development that gets it done.
