We Built AI to Help People—Not Replace Them

Amazon plans to cut up to 30,000 corporate jobs. 

Officially, it’s about “efficiency.” 

Quietly, it’s about something else: AI is here, and someone decided people weren’t.

Leaders everywhere are looking at AI and asking themselves a hard question: “If the machines can do it, do I still need the people?”

At Big Pixel, we think that’s the wrong question entirely. 

And we’re not saying that as AI critics—we’re an AI-forward development shop. We use it. We build with it. We teach it to our clients. 

But we were founded on the idea that software isn’t just about code. It’s about trust. And if you build systems by gutting the people inside them, you’re not being innovative. You’re being shortsighted.

So when headlines start treating people as an acceptable casualty of “AI transformation,” we might have something to say about that.

‍

Let’s stop pretending AI is the one doing the firing.

There’s a leadership trend emerging where AI becomes a kind of scapegoat. 

As if technology itself is forcing the shift. As if we’re just along for the ride, helpless to the code. 

But that’s not how this works. Every piece of AI in use today—whether it’s ChatGPT or a custom-built ML model—was made by people. Trained by people. Deployed by people. Interpreted and managed by people.

So when executives say “AI made this change necessary,” what they’re often doing is dodging accountability. 

Because the real truth is: someone chose to optimize for cost over capability. Someone chose to automate before asking whether the automation was ready. Someone chose to believe that removing humans would remove friction—when in reality, it often creates more of it.

And that’s the story no one wants to tell.

Back in 2023, Dropbox laid off 500 employees, explicitly citing a shift to AI. 

The messaging was clear: the company was “sunsetting non-AI work” and investing more in machine learning.

Instead of being praised as innovative, Dropbox faced immediate pushback—from former employees, customers, and even investors. The issue wasn’t that AI was being adopted. It was that people felt discarded. 

Long-time contributors were let go while the company celebrated its AI-first future. No clear plan for re-skilling. No open path for integration. Just a hard pivot and a hollow thank-you.

Internal morale dropped. Public reputation took a hit. And the AI tools being built didn’t magically outperform the humans they replaced. They needed months of adjustment, debugging, and human oversight to reach baseline expectations.

The moment you think people are optional, your systems start to break in ways you can’t predict. 

It’s not about nostalgia. 

It’s about operational sanity.

‍

Big Pixel was built to flip that thinking on its head.

David didn’t start Big Pixel to get rich off dev work. He started it because he saw too many good developers being treated like parts in a machine. 

Underpaid. Offshored. Left out of the conversation. Replaced before they even had a chance to grow.

He believed—like we still do—that great software isn’t about lines of code. It’s about clarity, collaboration, and trust. And those things don’t come from cutting corners or cutting people.

That’s why we don’t offshore.

It’s why we don’t treat developers as replaceable.

It’s why every client knows the name of every team member on their project.

Because people do their best work when they feel seen. And clients get the best results when there’s no mystery behind the curtain.

And now, as AI reshapes the way we work, we hold that philosophy tighter—not looser.

We use AI every day. But not to cut people out—to bring them forward.

We use AI to draft SQL queries, accelerate testing, refactor legacy code, and even catch bugs faster. 

But it’s not a one-click “replace the developer” system. 

It’s a force multiplier. It makes our devs stronger, not smaller.

Here’s what that looks like in practice:

• A junior dev learns five years' worth of pattern recognition in six months, because AI fills the gaps and gives real-time feedback.
  
  
• A project manager stops spending hours manually sorting data—because a prompt-based tool we built does it faster.
  
  
• A designer mocks up interactive elements that used to take a full day—because AI helps generate the scaffolding.

But in every case, a person is still the architect. Still the final voice. Still the one asking, “Does this make sense for the user?”—a question AI can’t answer.

The value didn’t disappear. It got reallocated to places where human thinking actually matters.

That’s how we’ve always seen this moment. Not as a threat. But as a challenge to do better.

‍

The companies that get this wrong will lose more than just team members.

They’ll lose context. Momentum. Customer trust. The soul of their work.

You can’t remove the human layer and expect the work to remain human-centered. 

And you can’t throw tools at problems if you’ve laid off the people who know what the problem actually is.

Here’s what usually happens when a company makes an “AI-first” layoff wave:

• The remaining teams lose clarity, because domain knowledge just walked out the door.
  
  
• AI models underperform, because no one stuck around to tune them properly.
  
  
• Clients get frustrated, because relationships were severed overnight.
  
  
• Innovation slows down, because no one wants to take risks in a culture of fear.
  
  

That’s not a tech problem. That’s a leadership problem.

We’re not saying every company needs to keep every role forever. We get that businesses evolve. We evolve too.

But there’s a difference between evolving with your team and evolving at the expense of them.

‍

So where does that leave us? 

We’re not anti-AI. 

That’s not the takeaway. 

We’re using it in everything from backend optimization to client dashboards. We’ve invested heavily in training our own tools, using platforms like Vanna.ai for smart queries, building multi-agent dev workflows, and embedding automation across our delivery pipeline.

But all of that is in service of making our people better. Not smaller. Not fewer.

And when we talk to clients—especially scaling businesses in operations-heavy spaces—they don’t say, “Help us get rid of people.” 

They say:

• “We’re growing, but our systems can’t keep up.”
  
  
• “Our team is burned out doing the same manual steps over and over.”
  
  
• “We need better data, faster—but we still want to understand it.”
  
  

AI helps solve those things. But only when it’s paired with people who know what good looks like.

That’s what we show up to do.

‍

You get one shot to set the tone for how AI works in your company. Make it count.

If your first instinct is to cut people and replace them with automation, you’re building on sand.

You’ll spend the next two years fixing what you broke.

But if your instinct is to ask, “How can this tech unlock more of our team’s value?”

Now you’re building on bedrock. Now you’re future-proofing.

AI is not your enemy. It’s not your savior either. It’s a tool.

And the companies who use it to empower their people—not erase them—will win this next chapter.

We built Big Pixel to be one of those companies.

And we partner with leaders who feel the same.

‍

We believe that business is built on transparency and trust.

We believe that good software is built the same way.

That’s how we use AI.

That’s how we treat our team.

And that’s how we’ll treat yours.