You’ve been here before. A dev shop says your project will be around $50K.
You approve it.
Three months later, you’ve paid $62K, the dashboard doesn’t filter correctly, and now they want to revisit the feature list—again.
You feel it in your stomach before you see it on the invoice: the creeping suspicion that you’re no longer paying for progress. You’re paying for indecision, padding, and bad planning.
You’re not alone.
One client came to us after two failed builds and nearly $140K gone—with nothing to show but a login screen and a graveyard of Slack threads.
The worst part wasn’t the loss.
It was the lack of clarity. They didn’t know where the project stood. They didn’t know what they were paying for. They didn’t even know who to ask.
That kind of fog isn’t accidental; it’s foundational. And it’s exactly why most dev shops refuse to offer fixed-fee pricing.
Because fixed-fee demands clarity.
And clarity breaks their model.
Fixed-fee isn’t just a pricing model.
It’s a test of integrity. And most dev shops aren’t built for it.
The traditional agency model thrives on ambiguity.
Hourly billing lets them:
In short, it gives them leverage. And most clients don’t know what they’ve lost until it’s too late.
We’ve seen the pattern over and over again:
Fixed-fee makes that behavior impossible.
It demands:
But here’s the real truth: most vendors avoid fixed-fee because they don’t want to be accountable.
Not really.
They’d rather stay flexible—at your expense.
If a dev shop tells you fixed-fee is “too risky,” listen closely.
What they’re really saying is:
We’ve taken over enough burned projects to know this is true.
One ops director we worked with inherited a platform that looked great on the surface—but had zero documentation, no admin controls, and features hardcoded with no way to update them.
The vendor’s answer? “We can fix it in another phase.”
That’s not poor planning. That’s the business model.
And clients get stuck in that loop because fixed-fee, while simple on paper, requires serious structure.
It’s not just quoting a price—it’s standing behind it.
Fixed-fee isn’t easier. It’s more work.
It requires:
It requires a team that doesn’t just "develop"—they lead.
At Big Pixel, that leadership starts long before code.
We sit with your team and ask hard questions:
What are you really solving?
Who touches this tool daily?
What systems does it replace?
What can’t go wrong?
We’ve worked with teams buried in decision fatigue. One client came to us after an hourly agency left them with a bloated backlog, four dashboards that didn’t talk to each other, and three sets of reports they had to compile manually. The ops lead said, “I spend more time patching workarounds than doing my actual job.”
Our fixed-fee process untangled all of that—not with magic, but with structure:
And we delivered what others promised—but couldn’t: usable tools, defined costs, and real momentum.
Fixed-fee only works when both sides show up.
The client has to decide. The partner has to lead.
And the process has to hold them both accountable.
At Big Pixel, fixed-fee isn’t just a billing preference. It’s how we build trust.
We believe that business is built on transparency and trust.
We believe that good software is built the same way.
That means we:
Fixed-fee changes the nature of the engagement:
It’s also why we’ve helped:
In every case, we quoted fixed-fee. And we delivered.
Because when everyone commits to the same outcome, great software gets built—fast.
If a dev shop avoids fixed-fee, that’s not a red flag. That’s the whole siren.
It means they’re not ready to be held to their word. Not ready to commit to outcomes. Not ready to put their name next to a price and a plan and say: We’ve got this.
At Big Pixel, we don’t just say it. We sign for it.
Fixed-fee isn’t risky.
Building without it is.
This blog post is proudly brought to you by Big Pixel, a 100% U.S. based custom design and software development firm located near the city of Raleigh, NC.
You’ve been here before. A dev shop says your project will be around $50K.
You approve it.
Three months later, you’ve paid $62K, the dashboard doesn’t filter correctly, and now they want to revisit the feature list—again.
You feel it in your stomach before you see it on the invoice: the creeping suspicion that you’re no longer paying for progress. You’re paying for indecision, padding, and bad planning.
You’re not alone.
One client came to us after two failed builds and nearly $140K gone—with nothing to show but a login screen and a graveyard of Slack threads.
The worst part wasn’t the loss.
It was the lack of clarity. They didn’t know where the project stood. They didn’t know what they were paying for. They didn’t even know who to ask.
That kind of fog isn’t accidental; it’s foundational. And it’s exactly why most dev shops refuse to offer fixed-fee pricing.
Because fixed-fee demands clarity.
And clarity breaks their model.
Fixed-fee isn’t just a pricing model.
It’s a test of integrity. And most dev shops aren’t built for it.
The traditional agency model thrives on ambiguity.
Hourly billing lets them:
In short, it gives them leverage. And most clients don’t know what they’ve lost until it’s too late.
We’ve seen the pattern over and over again:
Fixed-fee makes that behavior impossible.
It demands:
But here’s the real truth: most vendors avoid fixed-fee because they don’t want to be accountable.
Not really.
They’d rather stay flexible—at your expense.
If a dev shop tells you fixed-fee is “too risky,” listen closely.
What they’re really saying is:
We’ve taken over enough burned projects to know this is true.
One ops director we worked with inherited a platform that looked great on the surface—but had zero documentation, no admin controls, and features hardcoded with no way to update them.
The vendor’s answer? “We can fix it in another phase.”
That’s not poor planning. That’s the business model.
And clients get stuck in that loop because fixed-fee, while simple on paper, requires serious structure.
It’s not just quoting a price—it’s standing behind it.
Fixed-fee isn’t easier. It’s more work.
It requires:
It requires a team that doesn’t just "develop"—they lead.
At Big Pixel, that leadership starts long before code.
We sit with your team and ask hard questions:
What are you really solving?
Who touches this tool daily?
What systems does it replace?
What can’t go wrong?
We’ve worked with teams buried in decision fatigue. One client came to us after an hourly agency left them with a bloated backlog, four dashboards that didn’t talk to each other, and three sets of reports they had to compile manually. The ops lead said, “I spend more time patching workarounds than doing my actual job.”
Our fixed-fee process untangled all of that—not with magic, but with structure:
And we delivered what others promised—but couldn’t: usable tools, defined costs, and real momentum.
Fixed-fee only works when both sides show up.
The client has to decide. The partner has to lead.
And the process has to hold them both accountable.
At Big Pixel, fixed-fee isn’t just a billing preference. It’s how we build trust.
We believe that business is built on transparency and trust.
We believe that good software is built the same way.
That means we:
Fixed-fee changes the nature of the engagement:
It’s also why we’ve helped:
In every case, we quoted fixed-fee. And we delivered.
Because when everyone commits to the same outcome, great software gets built—fast.
If a dev shop avoids fixed-fee, that’s not a red flag. That’s the whole siren.
It means they’re not ready to be held to their word. Not ready to commit to outcomes. Not ready to put their name next to a price and a plan and say: We’ve got this.
At Big Pixel, we don’t just say it. We sign for it.
Fixed-fee isn’t risky.
Building without it is.
This blog post is proudly brought to you by Big Pixel, a 100% U.S. based custom design and software development firm located near the city of Raleigh, NC.